Advocate a good, not too pricey, scanner, which is very good for unfavorable / slide scanning?
Query by Kosh: Advise a decent, not too high-priced, scanner, which is very good for unfavorable / slide scanning?
I am acquiring a lot of conflicting data, seeing a lot of conflicting critiques.
Some reviews will say “great with negatives” and yet another will say “horrible for film”.
My focus on acquiring a new scanner is largely for film AND slides. I have a realistic scanner for scanning documents. What I need is one particular to scan my numerous great pics to digital format, from the unique negatives or slides.
Convenience does indicate one thing, but good quality of the film scan signifies a lot far more. It’s also tremendously preferable to be ready to scan mounted slides without getting to take them apart. And although I never need to have an car-feed or hi-speed scanner, an capability to scan more than one particular neg at a time would be great.
I have been eying scanners like the Canon LiDE 700F, the Epson Perfection V300, the Canon 5600F, Canon 8800F, Epson Perfection V500 Photo, and so forth.
It looks like I really should be ready to get a decent scanner for this objective amongst $ one hundred-200. Of course, if a substantial benefit could be gained by going a small larger, I would, even if it meant waiting a tiny for the acquire.
I’d like to hear from some men and women who have used some scanners with film, and their outcomes.
Thanks to you each (thus far).
Yes, image high quality is critical, as I would like to get a Much better scan off the negatives, than I would get from scanning the myriad 4×6 prints I have. It’s not just a matter of resolution but 1 of color top quality, given that I know that film holds a lot of instances the quantity of light info than that of paper.
It would be nice to just wait until I could afford to devote more than $ 1000 to a semi-pro scanner, but I feel the require to archive my outdated photographs prior to anything at all takes place to them and scanners seem to have reached a high quality, in which I could get a relatively great negative scan out of an low-cost scanner. It’s just the matter of which 1.
I wonder, although, if the Plustek is SO much better than the flatbed scanners that it is well worth the film-only format and improved value? And can it be adapted to use smaller film? It really is not absolute that I want a little-format alternative, but it would be good in case I decided to scan some outdated instamatic family p
Finest solution:
Answer by T-Bar
Canon is a discomfort to setup and does not scan as great as HP. I utilised numerous kinds of scanner for my magazine and HP is the greatest, fastest and most reputable. Your selection.
The HP G-3110 scans books, negatives, slides, at 9600 dpi. Right here is a link
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtools/item-facts.asp?EdpNo=4102774&SRCCODE=WEBINKPLP&cm_mmc_o=YztBBCjCmH4CjCmmVCjCmmV
Give your answer to this query under!
No related posts.
It all depends on what kind of quality you expect.
Most of the film and negative scanners (that aren’t flatbeds) are actually digital cameras mounted in a housing with a light source. These are only good for very low resolution images for on-line sharing. The main limiting factor with these devices is the quality of the lens used in the camera.
If you are looking for high quality images without spending a lot of money, the Plustek OpticFilm 7400 is a great value: http://bhpho.to/rLfQsc
So if you really aren’t too concerned with image quality, probably any scanner that says it scans film and slides will work for you. If you are serious about your photography and want the best quality at a reasonable cost, check out the Plustek 7400.